Boomer Money
  • About
  • Fine Print and Privacy
  • Glossary – Definition of Financial Terms

Beware Sequence of Returns Risk!

April 30, 2020 by Linda Vaughn
Vintage black and white photo of couple breaking up as man is on his knees and woman pulls away.

The takeaway:  Protect yourself from sequence of returns risk so it doesn’t wreak havoc with your retirement plans.  Sequence of returns risk is the danger that market returns will decimate your nest-egg, just as you finally need that money to live on. If you plan to ever live off your savings, you’ll want to understand sequence of returns risk so your money lasts as long as you do.

$$$

“I enjoy your blog, but I don’t know why you’d encourage people to buy bonds.  Historically, bonds barely pay half of what stocks pay.”  So said a friend the other day over Zoom.

Boomer, on the one hand she’s right.  Stocks do pay better than bonds; averaging 11.57% vs. 5.15%, respectively, since 1928.1  But without at least some bonds, your nest-egg is subject to the dangers of sequence of returns risk.  Understanding sequence of returns risk is vital for anyone ever planning to retire and live off their nest-egg.

What’s sequence of returns risk?

Black and white retro photo of three women comforting a typist about sequence of returns risk

She was fine until I told her about the $1 million nest-egg cut in half in only three years.  I was trying to protect her against sequence of returns risk!! 

Sequence of returns risk happens when market losses occur at the beginning of your retirement.  It’s when the market annually posts a series of negative returns shortly before or shortly after you retire.

Sequence of returns risk reared its ugly head when the dot.com bubble burst in 2000, and on its heels came September 11th. 

Today, conditions are ripe for it to happen again with the pandemic. 

Tomorrow, it’ll be some other situation. 

Regardless of circumstance, understanding this risk can help you manage your nest-egg to avoid the huge losses sequence of returns risk can bring.  

If you want your money to last as long as you do, consider this post required reading.”

One woman whispering to the other about sequence of returns risk.

She’s so bossy about required reading.  Let’s get some social distance.

Forewarned is forearmed.  

How sequence of returns risk unfolded in real life.

Using actual stock market returns, here’s what happened to real people who retired in the year 2000 with a $1 million nest-egg.  (Add or subtract as many zeros as apply to you.)

I don’t know how much these folks withdrew from their nest-egg, but let’s assume it was $50,000 annually, adjusted each year for  inflation.2

Table 1 shows what happened to these people.  Here’s the shocker:  their $1 million nest-egg was nearly cut in half in three short years.  It was pretty well gone in 17 years.  

Table 1.  When sequence of returns risk results in market losses coming at the beginning of your retirement, its easy to blow through your nest egg.  

Note: The formula to achieve year-end stock values = preceding year’s value x (1 + current year market return).  Example:  for the year 2000, the stock value is $1,000,000 x (1+(-.0903) = $909,700 .   For 2001, the ending stock value is $909,700 x (1+(-.1185) = $757,826.  The same method is used for calculating annual withdrawals:  $50,000 x (1+(.0280)=$51,400.
Source: Stock returns are from the Federal Reserve database in St. Louis and compiled by my former UCLA finance instructor–Aswath Damodaran–currently at the NYU Stern School of Business.  Inflation rates can be found here.  (Scroll down.)

Boomer, let.that.sink.in.

A $1 million nest-egg was cut in half in three years.

(I need air.)

That, my shell-shocked Boomer, is (preventable) sequence of returns risk.  It’s most lethal when it happens at the beginning of your retirement.  

Woman sitting with friend gravely contemplating sequence of returns risk.

I need a moment to let this all sink in.  

Losses from sequence of returns risk aren’t nearly as harmful when they come toward the end of your retirement.

When negative market returns occur late in your retirement, sequence of returns risk isn’t nearly as devastating.  For example, in Table 2 we reverse the order of the market returns used in Table 1.  (See second column in both tables.)  .

When we reverse the order, and losses come late in retirement, the effects aren’t nearly as harmful.  As shown in Table 2, the portfolio finishes with a balance of $1.4 million. 

In contrast, the early losses we saw in Table 1 left a portfolio with only $21,461.  

Table 2. When losses from sequence of returns come at the end of your retirement, the harm isn’t nearly as devastating.

Note: The formula to achieve year-end stock values = preceding year’s value x (1 + current year-end stock values). Examples shown in the note under Table 1.
Source:  Stock returns are from the Federal Reserve database in St. Louis and compiled by my former UCLA finance instructor–Aswath Damodaran–currently at the NYU Stern School of Business.  Inflation rates can be found here.  (Scroll down.)

black and white vintage photo of kids in a classroom listening to lecture on sequence of return risk.

Hey! You in the front row looking out the window. Listen up! Ya gotta understand sequence of return risk to prevent it.

The only difference was that the first portfolio, in Table 1, suffered major losses because sequence of return risk occurred at the beginning retirement. 

The other portfolio, in Table 2, had the same negative returns, but they came at the end of retirement. 

The results were stark:  $21,461 vs. $1,349,707.”

Boomer, it’s all about when negative returns occur.  See the summary in Table 3.    

Table 3.  Recap:  the astonishing difference when negative
returns happen at the beginning vs. the end of retirement.

Source:  BoomerMoneyandMore.com data calculations using sources cited for Tables 1 and 2.

Why is sequence of returns risk so damaging when losses come early in your retirement?

Black and White Retro photo of man in his messy office upset about sequence of returns risk.

I could’ve left this stinkin’ job years ago if I’d understood sequence of return risk.

When the market goes down early in your retirement, it reduces the price of stock shares. As such, stocks are selling cheap. To sell off those cheap shares for living expenses, you have to sell more of them to get the money you need.

You then have fewer stocks remaining that can grow and appreciate.  Consequently, your nest-egg depletes more quickly than it would if you could’ve sold-off fewer shares at a higher price.  

Capeesh?  

(If no, head down to footnote 3.)  

The fix:  diversification.

If you have money coming in and can make deposits to your nest-egg, consider diversifying your portfolio. Diversification is when different assets, like stocks vs. bonds, respond differently to the same event; one goes up and the other goes down.4

Notice the circled entries in columns D and F in Table 4 below.  When stocks go down, bonds go up.  This is diversification in the wild, with actual market returns.

Table 4.  With diversification, the portfolio finishes $1.2 million (not $21K); sequence of return risk is avoided; and as stocks go down, bonds go up–and vice versa.  What’s not to love?

 

Note:  *The formula for withdrawal rates, column C, is the preceding year’s withdrawal x (1+ current year’s inflation rate).  
**
The formula to achieve year-end stock and bond values, columns E and G, = preceding year’s value x (1 + current year market return).
Examples for all of the above are given in Table 1 footnotes.
Source:  Stock and bond returns are from the Federal Reserve database in St. Louis and compiled by my former UCLA finance instructor–Aswath Damodaran–currently at the NYU Stern School of Business.  Inflation rates can be found here.  (Scroll down.)

Also in Table 4, $50,000, adjusted for annually for inflation, is taken out each year — $25,000 from stocks and $25,000 from bonds.

Compare the results:  the diversified portfolio, in Table 4 above, closes out at $1.2 million and sequence of return risk is avoided.  In contrast, those poor folks in Table 1 only ended up with $21,461.

This, ladies and gentlemen, was the exact example I wanted to tell my friend who thinks bonds are ridiculous.  ?

I wanted to tell her they’re ridiculous the same way home and car insurance are ridiculous.  That insurance may be costing her money, but go without it, and it could be costing her a lot more further down the line.     

Hang up! We need to talk about diversification’s effect on sequence of returns risk.

So it is with diversification. Invest solely in stocks and you could lose most of your money in short order, if sequence of returns rears its ugly head.5  Go solely with bonds and you’ll hardly make any money.  You need both.

(More on diversification can be found in the asset allocation series in general–right side bar–and specifically here and here.)

Up next.

In an upcoming post, we’ll discuss some other methods of protecting your nest-egg. For now, you clearly know more about sequence of returns risk than most civilian investors out there.  You also know how to lessen its effects through diversification. Nicely done, Boomer.

Until next month, be safe.  Stay well.  

You got this.

$$$

P.S. Always do your own due diligence. 

Footnotes.

1Stock returns are from the Federal Reserve database in St. Louis and compiled by my former UCLA finance instructor–Aswath Damodaran–currently at the NYU Stern School of Business. 

2This post describes how to adjust your withdrawals for inflation each year and provides a step-by-step guide on how to draw down your nest-egg and determine how big a nest-egg you’ll need for the income you require.

3Here’s how to think about it. Suppose you need $1000 a month to supplement your social security. In a down market, stocks might on average be selling for $20 a share.  You need to sell off 50 shares to get your $1000.  ($20 a share x 50 shares = $1000).

In contrast, in an up market, stocks might be averaging $50 a share.  You only need to sell 20 of them to get your $1000.  ($50 a share x 20 shares = $1000).

Since you didn’t have to sell off as many shares in an up market, as you did in a down market, you now have more shares left that can grow and appreciate in value.

How much more?  150% more! (50 shares sold in the down market – 20 shares sold in the up market) / 20 sold in the upmarket shares = 150% more shares had to be sold in the down market).

And this is just monthly.  Get three years with differences like these and it’s all over but the shoutin’.

4Tip to the hat to Nick Lioudis over at Investopedia for this plainspoken definition of diversification.  Tip of the hat also to Boomer.Money and to Investopedia for their descriptions of sequence of returns risk.

5As always, when I’m talking about stocks, I’m referring to stock mutual funds; preferably index funds.

$$$

Hi there! If this post helped you, could you consider sharing it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter? It's not easy being a small blog in a sea of a million blogs!! Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin
Posted in: Asset Allocation Series, Investing Basics Tagged: Anders Ericcson, Deliberate practice, Peak Book Review
← The Coronavirus and Your Nest-Egg
Deliberate Purposeful Practice Wins the Day: Not Talent! Book Review. →

Categories

  • A Boomer Manifesto (1)
  • Annuity series (6)
  • Asset Allocation Series (8)
  • Book Reviews (12)
  • Boomer Reinvention (11)
  • Don't Outlive Your Money Series (10)
  • Investing Basics (7)
  • Long-Term Care Series (14)
  • Managing Retirement Money and Accounts (5)
  • Money Thoughts (5)
  • Real Estate Series (3)
  • Social Security (1)
  • Uncategorized (4)

Recent Posts

  • Resilience: Your Most Valuable Retirement Skill. Here’s How to Build It. (Book Review.)
  • To Not Outlive Your Money, You’ve Got to Know Where it Goes
  • How to Stop the Sting of Retirement’s Out-of-Pocket Medical Bills. (Or at Least Reduce the Pain.)
  • My Encounters in the Wild with Long-Term Care Sales Agents
  • The Three Factors Affecting Your Long-Term Care Insurance Costs
  • How to Evaluate a Long-Term Care Policy. (Hint! Know These Three Things.)
  • Staring Down Your Long-Term Care Odds—Much Better News Than You Thought.
  • Getting Medicaid to (Maybe) Pay for Your Nursing Home Costs: The (Updated) Guide.
  • That Time a $2,000 Price Tag Cost Me $60K.

Archives

  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • July 2022
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • September 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016

Copyright © 2023 Boomer Money... and More.

Lifestyle WordPress Theme by themehit.com